The problem with `The Problem of Time'
arXiv:1811.09660
Abstract
We investigate three aspects of the supposed problem of time: The disagreement between the treatments of time in general relativity and quantum theory, the problem of recovering time from within an isolated Universe and the prevalence of a unidirectional time flow (i.e., the so-called arrow of time). Under our interpretation, general relativity and quantum theory have complementary time treatments given that they emerge from a theory of a more fundamental nature. To model an isolated Universe, we use the Wheeler-DeWitt equation and then apply the Page-Wootters method of recovering time. It is argued that, if the recovery of an experience of time is indeed viable in this framework, interactions and quantum entanglement are both essential features, even though the former is normally an afterthought or altogether dismissed. As for the one-way arrow of time, this is, from our perspective, a consequence of including the aforementioned interactions. But underlying our interpretation, and pretty much all others, is the necessity for causality. It is this fundamental tenet which accounts for our experience of time but yet can only be postulated. Our conclusion is that the `problem of causality' is what should be the focal point of future investigations.
arXiv comment47 pages, 4 figures
References in corpus (12)
- Holographic Derivation of Entanglement Entropy from AdS/CFT
- Thermodynamics of Spacetime: The Einstein Equation of State
- The Physics of 'Now'
- Evolution without evolution, and without ambiguities
- The clock ambiguity and the emergence of physical laws
- Causality re-established
- Cosmology, Time's Arrow, and That Old Double Standard
- What if Time Really Exists?
- The Conditional Probability Interpretation of the Hamiltonian Constraint
- Losing the IR: a Holographic Framework for Area Theorems
- Was inflation necessary for the existence of time?
- Requiem for an ideal clock