What we cannot learn from analogue experiments

Abstract

Analogue experiments have attracted interest for their potential to shed light on inaccessible domains. For instance, `dumb holes' in fluids and Bose-Einstein condensates, as analogues of black holes, have been promoted as means of confirming the existence of Hawking radiation in real black holes. We compare analogue experiments with other cases of experiment and simulation in physics. We argue---contra recent claims in the philosophical literature---that analogue experiments are not capable of confirming the existence of particular phenomena in inaccessible target systems. As they must assume the physical adequacy of the modelling framework used to describe the inaccessible target system, arguments to the conclusion that analogue experiments can yield confirmation for phenomena in those target systems, such as Hawking radiation in black holes, beg the question.

arXiv comment27 pages, 2 figures; forthcoming in Synthese

References in corpus (9)

• Analogue Gravity
• Black Holes at the LHC
• High Energy Colliders as Black Hole Factories: The End of Short Distance Physics
• Sonic analog of gravitational black holes in Bose-Einstein condensates
• Observation of quantum Hawking radiation and its entanglement in an analogue black hole
• TASI Lectures on Inflation
• Observation of negative-frequency waves in a water tank: A classical analogue to the Hawking effect?
• Bounds on isocurvature perturbations from CMB and LSS data
• What Can We Learn From Analogue Experiments?