Data Science as Political Action: Grounding Data Science in a Politics of Justice
arXiv:1811.03435 · doi:10.23919/JSC.2021.0029
Abstract
In response to public scrutiny of data-driven algorithms, the field of data science has adopted ethics training and principles. Although ethics can help data scientists reflect on certain normative aspects of their work, such efforts are ill-equipped to generate a data science that avoids social harms and promotes social justice. In this article, I argue that data science must embrace a political orientation. Data scientists must recognize themselves as political actors engaged in normative constructions of society and evaluate their work according to its downstream impacts on people's lives. I first articulate why data scientists must recognize themselves as political actors. In this section, I respond to three arguments that data scientists commonly invoke when challenged to take political positions regarding their work. In confronting these arguments, I describe why attempting to remain apolitical is itself a political stance--a fundamentally conservative one--and why data science's attempts to promote "social good" dangerously rely on unarticulated and incrementalist political assumptions. I then propose a framework for how data science can evolve toward a deliberative and rigorous politics of social justice. I conceptualize the process of developing a politically engaged data science as a sequence of four stages. Pursuing these new approaches will empower data scientists with new methods for thoughtfully and rigorously contributing to social justice.
References in corpus (6)
- The Contestation of Tech Ethics: A Sociotechnical Approach to Technology Ethics in Practice
- Escaping the Impossibility of Fairness: From Formal to Substantive Algorithmic Fairness
- It's Time to Do Something: Mitigating the Negative Impacts of Computing Through a Change to the Peer Review Process
- Algorithmic Injustices: Towards a Relational Ethics
- Embedded EthiCS: Integrating Ethics Broadly Across Computer Science Education
- What About Applied Fairness?
Cited by in corpus (13)
- Envisioning Communities: A Participatory Approach Towards AI for Social Good
- Seeing Like a Toolkit: How Toolkits Envision the Work of AI Ethics
- Conservative AI and social inequality: Conceptualizing alternatives to bias through social theory
- Cruising Queer HCI on the DL: A Literature Review of LGBTQ+ People in HCI
- Towards Accountability for Machine Learning Datasets: Practices from Software Engineering and Infrastructure
- Studying Up Machine Learning Data: Why Talk About Bias When We Mean Power?
- Beyond "Fairness:" Structural (In)justice Lenses on AI for Education
- An Algorithmic Equity Toolkit for Technology Audits by Community Advocates and Activists
- Auditing Cross-Cultural Consistency of Human-Annotated Labels for Recommendation Systems
- Development of the Critical Reflection and Agency in Computing Index
- From Model Performance to Claim: How a Change of Focus in Machine Learning Replicability Can Help Bridge the Responsibility Gap
- A Mulching Proposal
- Surveillance, Stigma & Sociotechnical Design for HIV