Selection committees for academic recruitment: does gender matter?

Abstract

Underrepresentation of women in the academic system is a problem common to many countries, often associated with gender discrimination. In the Italian academic context in particular, favoritism is recognized as a diffuse phenomenon affecting hiring and career advancement. One of the questions that naturally arises is whether women who do assume decisional roles, having witnessed other phenomena of discrimination, would practice less favoritism than men in similar positions. Our analysis refers to the particular case of favoritism in the work of university selection committees responsible for career advancement. We observe a moderate positive association between competitions with expected outcomes and the fact the committee president is a woman. Although committees presided by women give more weight to scientific merit than those presided by men, favoritism still occurs. In fact, in the case the committee president is a woman, the single most important factor for the success of a candidate is joint research with the president; while in the case of male presidents, it is the years together in the same university.

arXiv commentarXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1810.12207

References in corpus (8)

• How do you define and measure research productivity?
• A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments
• Research productivity: are higher academic ranks more productive than lower ones?
• The importance of accounting for the number of co-authors and their order when assessing research performance at the individual level in the life sciences
• Revisiting the scaling of citations for research assessment
• What is the appropriate length of the publication period over which to assess research performance?
• Career advancement and scientific performance in universities
• Relatives in the same university faculty: nepotism or merit?

Cited by in corpus (5)

• Gender-Based Homophily in Research: A Large-Scale Study of Man-Woman Collaboration
• Gender differences in research performance within and between countries: Italy vs Norway
• Are Female Scientists Less Inclined to Publish Alone? The Gender Solo Research Gap
• Gender bias in academic recruitment
• Do open citations give insights on the qualitative peer-review evaluation in research assessments? An analysis of the Italian National Scientific Qualification