$H_0$ Tension: Response to Riess et al arXiv:1810.03526

Abstract

Riess et al (2018c) have claimed there exist seven problems in the analyses presented by Shanks et al (2018) where we argue that there is enough uncertainty in Cepheid distances and local peculiar velocity fields to explain the current tension in $H_0$. Here, we take each of the Riess et al (2018c) points in turn and suggest that either they do not apply or that the necessary caveats are already made by Shanks et al (2018). We conclude that the main point to be inferred from our analyses still stands which is that previous claims by Riess et al (2018b) that Gaia parallaxes confirm their Cepheid scale are, at best, premature in advance of further improvements in the Gaia astrometric solution.

arXiv comment3 pages, 1 figure

Cited by in corpus (6)

• $H_0$ from cosmic chronometers and Type Ia supernovae, with Gaussian Processes and the novel Weighted Polynomial Regression method
• Quantifying the evidence for the current speed-up of the Universe with low and intermediate-redshift data. A more model-independent approach
• Exploring the evidence for a large local void with supernovae Ia data
• Local Hole revisited: evidence for bulk motions and self-consistent outflow
• The effects of peculiar velocities in SN Ia environments on the local $H_0$ measurement
• High accuracy on $H_0$ constraints from gravitational wave lensing events