Effects of Redshift Uncertainty on Cross-Correlations of CMB Lensing and Galaxy Surveys

Abstract

We explore the effects of incorporating redshift uncertainty into measurements of galaxy clustering and cross-correlations of galaxy positions and cosmic microwave background (CMB) lensing maps. We use a simple Gaussian model for a redshift distribution in a redshift bin with two parameters: the mean, $z_0$, and the width, ${\sigma }_z$. We vary these parameters, as well as a galaxy bias parameter, $b_{\text{g}}$, and a matter fluctuations parameter, ${\sigma }_8$, for each redshift bin, as well as the parameter ${\Omega }_{\text{m}}$, in a Fisher analysis across 12 redshift bins from $z=0-7$. We find that incorporating redshift uncertainties degrades constraints on ${\sigma }_8(z)$ in the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST)/CMB-S4 era by about a factor of 10 compared to the case of perfect redshift knowledge. In our fiducial analysis of LSST/CMB-S4 including redshift uncertainties, we project constraints on ${\sigma }_8(z)$ for $z<3$ of less than $5\%$. Galaxy imaging surveys are expected to have priors on redshift parameters from photometric redshift algorithms and other methods. When adding priors with the expected precision for LSST redshift algorithms, the constraints on ${\sigma }_8(z)$ can be improved by a factor of 2-3 compared to the case of no prior information. We also find that `self-calibrated' constraints on the redshift parameters from just the autocorrelation and cross-correlation measurements (with no prior information) are competitive with photometric redshift techniques. In the LSST/CMB-S4 era, we find uncertainty on the redshift parameters ($z_0,{\sigma }_z$) to be below 0.004(1+z) at $z<1$. For all parameters, constraints improve significantly if smaller scales can be used. We also project constraints for nearer term survey combinations, Dark Energy Survey (DES)/SPT-SZ, DES/SPT-3G, and LSST/SPT-3G, and analyze how our constraints depend on a variety of parameter and model choices.

22 pages, 22 figures. Updated to match text published by PRD. Main conclusions unchanged, added Section IX and expanded Section VII D. Presented as a thesis to the Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, The University of Chicago, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree

References in corpus (19)

• Wide-Field InfrarRed Survey Telescope-Astrophysics Focused Telescope Assets WFIRST-AFTA 2015 Report
• The Dark Energy Survey Data Release 1
• Detection of Gravitational Lensing in the Cosmic Microwave Background
• SPT-3G: A Next-Generation Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization Experiment on the South Pole Telescope
• Calibrating Redshift Distributions Beyond Spectroscopic Limits with Cross-Correlations
• Parameter constraints from cross-correlation of CMB lensing with galaxy clustering
• SPTpol: an instrument for CMB polarization measurements with the South Pole Telescope
• A Measurement of the Correlation of Galaxy Surveys with CMB Lensing Convergence Maps from the South Pole Telescope
• Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cross-Correlation Redshifts - Methods and Systematics Characterization
• Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: tomographic cross-correlations between DES galaxies and CMB lensing from SPT+Planck
• Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Methodology and Projections for Joint Analysis of Galaxy Clustering, Galaxy Lensing, and CMB Lensing Two-point Functions
• Modeling CMB Lensing Cross Correlations with {\sc CLEFT}
• Wide-area tomography of CMB lensing and the growth of cosmological density fluctuations
• Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Calibration of redMaGiC Redshift Distributions in DES and SDSS from Cross-Correlations
• Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cross-Correlation Redshifts in the DES -- Calibration of the Weak Lensing Source Redshift Distributions
• Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cross-correlation between DES Y1 galaxy weak lensing and SPT+Planck CMB weak lensing
• CMB Lens Sample Covariance and Consistency Relations
• Self-consistent redshift estimation using correlation functions without a spectroscopic reference sample
• Optimizing galaxy samples for clustering measurements in photometric surveys

Cited by in corpus (3)

• Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Calibration of Lens Sample Redshift Distributions using Clustering Redshifts with BOSS/eBOSS
• Photo-z outlier self-calibration in weak lensing surveys
• CMB lensing reconstruction biases from masking extragalactic sources