Counter-intuitive behaviour of energy system models under CO2 caps and prices
arXiv:1809.03157 · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.052
Abstract
The mitigation of climate change requires a fundamental transition of the energy system. Affordability, reliability and the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions constitute central but often conflicting targets for this energy transition. Against this context, we reveal limitations and counter-intuitive results in the model-based optimization of energy systems, which are often applied for policy advice. When system costs are minimized in the presence of a CO2 cap, efficiency gains free a part of the CO2 cap, allowing cheap technologies to replace expensive low-emission technologies. Even more striking results are observed in a setup where emissions are minimized in the presence of a budget constraint. Increasing CO2 prices can oust clean, but expensive technologies out of the system, and eventually lead to higher emissions. These effects robustly occur in models of different scope and complexity. Hence, extreme care is necessary in the application of energy system optimization models to avoid misleading policy advice.
arXiv comment10 pages, 7 figures
References in corpus (8)
- PyPSA: Python for Power System Analysis
- Dynamically induced cascading failures in power grids
- Opening the black box of energy modelling: Strategies and lessons learned
- Transmission needs across a fully renewable European power system
- Non-Gaussian power grid frequency fluctuations characterized by Lévy-stable laws and superstatistics
- Validation of Danish wind time series from a new global renewable energy atlas for energy system analysis
- The role of spatial scale in joint optimisations of generation and transmission for European highly renewable scenarios
- Transdisciplinary electric power grid science