Distinct patterns of syntactic agreement errors in recurrent networks and humans

Abstract

Determining the correct form of a verb in context requires an understanding of the syntactic structure of the sentence. Recurrent neural networks have been shown to perform this task with an error rate comparable to humans, despite the fact that they are not designed with explicit syntactic representations. To examine the extent to which the syntactic representations of these networks are similar to those used by humans when processing sentences, we compare the detailed pattern of errors that RNNs and humans make on this task. Despite significant similarities (attraction errors, asymmetry between singular and plural subjects), the error patterns differed in important ways. In particular, in complex sentences with relative clauses error rates increased in RNNs but decreased in humans. Furthermore, RNNs showed a cumulative effect of attractors but humans did not. We conclude that at least in some respects the syntactic representations acquired by RNNs are fundamentally different from those used by humans.

Proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society

Cited by in corpus (6)

• Mechanisms for Handling Nested Dependencies in Neural-Network Language Models and Humans
• The emergence of number and syntax units in LSTM language models
• Open Sesame: Getting Inside BERT's Linguistic Knowledge
• Evaluating Models of Robust Word Recognition with Serial Reproduction
• What can linguistics and deep learning contribute to each other?
• An Analysis of the Utility of Explicit Negative Examples to Improve the Syntactic Abilities of Neural Language Models