A Retrospective Analysis of the Fake News Challenge Stance Detection Task
arXiv:1806.05180
Abstract
The 2017 Fake News Challenge Stage 1 (FNC-1) shared task addressed a stance classification task as a crucial first step towards detecting fake news. To date, there is no in-depth analysis paper to critically discuss FNC-1's experimental setup, reproduce the results, and draw conclusions for next-generation stance classification methods. In this paper, we provide such an in-depth analysis for the three top-performing systems. We first find that FNC-1's proposed evaluation metric favors the majority class, which can be easily classified, and thus overestimates the true discriminative power of the methods. Therefore, we propose a new F1-based metric yielding a changed system ranking. Next, we compare the features and architectures used, which leads to a novel feature-rich stacked LSTM model that performs on par with the best systems, but is superior in predicting minority classes. To understand the methods' ability to generalize, we derive a new dataset and perform both in-domain and cross-domain experiments. Our qualitative and quantitative study helps interpreting the original FNC-1 scores and understand which features help improving performance and why. Our new dataset and all source code used during the reproduction study are publicly available for future research.
References in corpus (3)
- A simple but tough-to-beat baseline for the Fake News Challenge stance detection task
- The Argument Reasoning Comprehension Task: Identification and Reconstruction of Implicit Warrants
- This Just In: Fake News Packs a Lot in Title, Uses Simpler, Repetitive Content in Text Body, More Similar to Satire than Real News
Cited by in corpus (11)
- False News On Social Media: A Data-Driven Survey
- Dataset of Fake News Detection and Fact Verification: A Survey
- Exploiting stance hierarchies for cost-sensitive stance detection of Web documents
- Transfer Learning from Transformers to Fake News Challenge Stance Detection (FNC-1) Task
- Misinformation Detection on YouTube Using Video Captions
- The Paradox of Information Access: Growing Isolation in the Age of Sharing
- Danish Stance Classification and Rumour Resolution
- PROVENANCE: An Intermediary-Free Solution for Digital Content Verification
- WhatTheWikiFact: Fact-Checking Claims Against Wikipedia
- Tanbih: Get To Know What You Are Reading
- Human-in-the-Loop Disinformation Detection: Stance, Sentiment, or Something Else?