Syntactic Dependency Representations in Neural Relation Classification
arXiv:1805.11461
Abstract
We investigate the use of different syntactic dependency representations in a neural relation classification task and compare the CoNLL, Stanford Basic and Universal Dependencies schemes. We further compare with a syntax-agnostic approach and perform an error analysis in order to gain a better understanding of the results.
arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1804.08887