Comparison of physical and observational galaxy cluster modelling

Abstract

We present a comparison between three cluster models applied to data obtained by the Arcminute Microkelvin Imager radio interferometer system. The physical model (PM) parameterises a cluster in terms of its physical quantities to model the dark matter and baryonic components of the cluster using NFW and GNFW profiles respectively. The observational models (OM I and OM II) model only the gas content of the cluster. The two OMs vary only in the priors they use in Bayesian inference: OM I has a joint prior on angular radius $\theta$ and integrated Comptonisation $Y$, derived from simulations, while OM II uses separable priors on $\theta$ and $Y$ which are based on calculations of the physical model. For the comparison we consider a sample of $54$ clusters which are a subsample of the second Planck catalogue of Sunyaev-Zel'dovich sources. We first compare the $Y$ estimates of the three models, and find that the PM generally yields lower estimates relative to the OMs. We then compute the Earth Mover's Distance between the $\theta$ - $Y$ posterior distributions obtained from each model for each cluster, and find that the two models which are most discrepant are PM and OM I. Finally, we compare the Bayesian evidence values obtained from each model for each cluster. OM I generally provides the best fit to the data but not at a statistically significant level, according to the Jeffreys scale. The highest evidence ratio obtained is actually in favour of the PM over OM I.

arXiv comment12 pages, 6 figures, 9 tables, 12 equations, MNRAS

References in corpus (11)

• Simulations of X-ray Clusters
• The universal galaxy cluster pressure profile from a representative sample of nearby systems (REXCESS) and the Y_SZ-M_500 relation
• Effects of Galaxy Formation on Thermodynamics of the Intracluster Medium
• The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Sunyaev Zel'dovich Selected Galaxy Clusters at 148 GHz in the 2008 Survey
• The Representative XMM-Newton Cluster Structure Survey (REXCESS) of an X-ray Luminosity Selected Galaxy Cluster Sample
• The Arcminute Microkelvin Imager
• A Digital Correlator Upgrade for the Arcminute MicroKelvin Imager
• Maximum-likelihood estimation of the CMB power spectrum from interferometer observations
• A simple parametric model for spherical galaxy clusters
• Sunyaev--Zel'dovich profile fitting with joint AMI-Planck analysis
• Physical modelling of galaxy clusters detected by Planck

Cited by in corpus (3)

• Physical modelling of galaxy clusters detected by Planck
• Physical modelling of galaxy clusters and Bayesian inference in astrophysics
• Geometric nested sampling: sampling from distributions defined on non-trivial geometries