How Problematic is the Near-Euclidean Spatial Geometry of the Large-Scale Universe?

Abstract

Modern observations based on general relativity indicate that the spatial geometry of the expanding, large-scale Universe is very nearly Euclidean. This basic empirical fact is at the core of the so-called "flatness problem", which is widely perceived to be a major outstanding problem of modern cosmology and as such forms one of the prime motivations behind inflationary models. An inspection of the literature and some further critical reflection however quickly reveals that the typical formulation of this putative problem is fraught with questionable arguments and misconceptions and that it is moreover imperative to distinguish between different varieties of problem. It is shown that the observational fact that the large-scale Universe is so nearly flat is ultimately no more puzzling than similar "anthropic coincidences", such as the specific (orders of magnitude of the) values of the gravitational and electromagnetic coupling constants. In particular, there is no fine-tuning problem in connection to flatness of the kind usually argued for. The arguments regarding flatness and particle horizons typically found in cosmological discourses in fact address a mere $single$ issue underlying the standard FLRW cosmologies, namely the $extreme$ improbability of these models with respect to any "reasonable measure" on the "space of all spacetimes". This issue may be expressed in different ways and a phase space formulation, due to Penrose, is presented here. A horizon problem only arises when additional assumptions - which are usually kept implicit and at any rate seem rather speculative - are made.

arXiv comment25 pages, 2 figures. Minor revisions for published version

References in corpus (23)

• First Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Determination of Cosmological Parameters
• Type Ia Supernova Discoveries at z>1 From the Hubble Space Telescope: Evidence for Past Deceleration and Constraints on Dark Energy Evolution
• Inflationary paradigm in trouble after Planck2013
• Cosmic homogeneity demonstrated with luminous red galaxies
• Time drift of cosmological redshifts as a test of the Copernican principle
• The Large-Scale Smoothness of the Universe
• The past attractor in inhomogeneous cosmology
• An Alternative to Inflation
• The scale of homogeneity of the galaxy distribution in SDSS DR6
• Quantum Field Theory Is Not Merely Quantum Mechanics Applied to Low Energy Effective Degrees of Freedom
• Model-independent curvature determination with 21cm intensity mapping experiments
• The isotropic blackbody CMB as evidence for a homogeneous universe
• Lectures on Inflation
• Getting the Measure of the Flatness Problem
• The flatness problem and $\Lambda$
• A Dynamical Study of the Friedmann Equations
• The nearly flat universe
• Advanced Topics in Cosmology: A Pedagogical Introduction
• On the genericity of spacetime singularities
• Integration of the Friedmann equation for universes of arbitrary complexity
• Foundations of Quantum Gravity : The Role of Principles Grounded in Empirical Reality
• Electroweak Symmetry Breaking, Intermediate Regulators and Physics Beyond the Standard Model
• Time Since the Beginning

Cited by in corpus (2)

• Explanatory Depth in Primordial Cosmology: A Comparative Study of Inflationary and Bouncing Paradigms
• f(R,T) Gravity Model Behaving as a Dark Energy Source