Analysis of Time Scale to Consensus in Voting Dynamics with more than Two Options
arXiv:1802.04654 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.97.042320
Abstract
We generalize a binary majority-vote model on adaptive networks to its plurality-vote counterpart and analyze the time scale to consensus when voters are given more than two options. When opinions are uniformly distributed in the population of voters in the initial state, we find that the time scale to consensus is shorter than the binary vote model from both numerical simulations and mathematical analysis using the master equation for the three-state plurality-vote model. When intervention such as opinion conversion is allowed, as in the case of sudden change of mind of voter for any reason, the effort needed to push the fragmented three-opinion population in the thermodynamic limit to the consensus state, measured in minimal intervention cost, is less than that needed to push a polarized two-opinion population to the consensus state, when the degree () of homophily is less than 0.8. For finite system, the fragmented three-opinion population will spontaneously reach the consensus state, with faster time to consensus, compared to polarized two-opinion population, for a broad range of .
arXiv commentarXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1606.03686 author note: final version submitted to publisher
References in corpus (6)
- Statistical physics of social dynamics
- Opinion evolution in closed community
- Minority Opinion Spreading in Random Geometry
- Opinion dynamics in a three-choice system
- The drastic outcomes from voting alliances in three-party bottom-up democratic voting (1990 2013)
- Non-monotonic spontaneous magnetization in a Sznajd-like Consensus Model
Cited by in corpus (6)
- Discrete Opinion Dynamics with M choices
- Noise induced unanimity and disorder in opinion formation
- Vanishing opinions in Latané model of opinion formation
- Universality of opinions disappearing in sociophysical models of opinion dynamics: From initial multitude of opinions to ultimate consensus
- Fine structure of phase diagram for social impact theory
- Role of Zealots on the Adaptive Voter Model