Distinguishing Cause from Effect Using Quantiles: Bivariate Quantile Causal Discovery
arXiv:1801.10579
Abstract
Causal inference using observational data is challenging, especially in the bivariate case. Through the minimum description length principle, we link the postulate of independence between the generating mechanisms of the cause and of the effect given the cause to quantile regression. Based on this theory, we develop Bivariate Quantile Causal Discovery (bQCD), a new method to distinguish cause from effect assuming no confounding, selection bias or feedback. Because it uses multiple quantile levels instead of the conditional mean only, bQCD is adaptive not only to additive, but also to multiplicative or even location-scale generating mechanisms. To illustrate the effectiveness of our approach, we perform an extensive empirical comparison on both synthetic and real datasets. This study shows that bQCD is robust across different implementations of the method (i.e., the quantile regression), computationally efficient, and compares favorably to state-of-the-art methods.
arXiv commentTo appear ICML 2020
References in corpus (15)
- Distinguishing cause from effect using observational data: methods and benchmarks
- On the Identifiability of the Post-Nonlinear Causal Model
- CAM: Causal additive models, high-dimensional order search and penalized regression
- Causal Inference in the Presence of Latent Variables and Selection Bias
- On Causal and Anticausal Learning
- Causality for Machine Learning
- Single-Model Uncertainties for Deep Learning
- Identifiability of Causal Graphs using Functional Models
- Telling Cause from Effect using MDL-based Local and Global Regression
- Causal Inference via Kernel Deviance Measures
- Consistency of Causal Inference under the Additive Noise Model
- Copulas as High-Dimensional Generative Models: Vine Copula Autoencoders
- Causal Generative Neural Networks
- From Dependence to Causation
- Selection of Sparse Vine Copulas in High Dimensions with the Lasso