Accelerators in macroeconomics: Comparison of discrete and continuous approaches
arXiv:1712.09605 · doi:10.3844/ajebasp.2017.47.55
Abstract
We prove that the standard discrete-time accelerator equation cannot be considered as an exact discrete analog of the continuous-time accelerator equation. This leads to fact that the standard discrete-time macroeconomic models cannot be considered as exact discretization of the corresponding continuous-time models. As a result, the equations of the continuous and standard discrete models have different solutions and can predict the different behavior of the economy. In this paper, we propose a self-consistent discrete-time description of the economic accelerators that is based on the exact finite differences. For discrete-time approach, the model equations with exact differences have the same solutions as the corresponding continuous-time models and these discrete and continuous models describe the same behavior of the economy. Using the Harrod-Domar growth model as an example, we show that equations of the continuous-time model and the suggested exact discrete model have the same solutions and these models predict the same behavior of the economy.
arXiv comment12 pages, pdf
References in corpus (6)
- Logistic map with memory from economic model
- Concept of dynamic memory in economics
- Long and Short Memory in Economics: Fractional-Order Difference and Differentiation
- Fractional Dynamics of Natural Growth and Memory Effect in Economics
- Dynamic intersectoral models with power-law memory
- Economic Growth Model with Constant Pace and Dynamic Memory