Sunspot number second differences as a precursor of the following 11-year sunspot cycle
arXiv:1712.05782 · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa93ef
Abstract
Forecasting the strength of the sunspot cycle is highly important for many space weather applications. Our previous studies have shown the importance of sunspot number variability in the declining phase of the current 11-year sunspot cycle to predict the strength of the next cycle when the minimum of the current cycle has been observed. In this study we continue this approach and show that we can remove the limitation of having to know the minimum epoch of the current cycle, and that we can already provide a forecast of the following cycle strength in the early stage of the declining phase of the current cycle. We introduce a method to reliably calculate sunspot number second differences (SNSD) in order to quantify the short-term variations of sunspot activity. We demonstrate a steady relationship between the SNSD dynamics in the early stage of the declining phase of a given cycle and the strength of the following sunspot cycle. This finding may bear physical implications on the underlying dynamo at work. From this relation, a relevant indicator is constructed that distinguishes whether the next cycle will be stronger or weaker compared to the current one. We demonstrate that within 24-31 months after reaching the maximum of the cycle, it can be decided with high probability (0.96) whether the next cycle will be weaker or stronger. We predict that sunspot cycle 25 will be weaker than the current cycle 24.
16 pages, 10 figures, published in ApJ
References in corpus (2)
Cited by in corpus (12)
- Hemispheric sunspot numbers 1874--2020
- CME -- HSS interaction and characteristics tracked from Sun to Earth
- Solar Flare-CME Coupling Throughout Two Acceleration Phases of a Fast CME
- Using radio triangulation to understand the origin of two subsequent type II radio bursts
- Medium-term predictions of F10.7 and F30 cm solar radio flux with the adaptive Kalman filter
- On the three-dimensional relation between the coronal dimming, erupting filament and CME. Case study of the 28 October 2021 X1.0 event
- Multi-instrument STIX microflare study
- Spotless days and geomagnetic index as the predictors of solar cycle 25
- Maximal growth rate of the ascending phase of a sunspot cycle for predicting its amplitude
- Multi-point study of the energy release and impulsive CME dynamics in an eruptive C7 flare
- Three-part structure of solar coronal mass ejection observed in low coronal signatures of Solar Orbiter
- Solar Cycle Prediction: Challenges, Progress, and Future Perspectives