A practical guide and software for analysing pairwise comparison experiments

Abstract

Most popular strategies to capture subjective judgments from humans involve the construction of a unidimensional relative measurement scale, representing order preferences or judgments about a set of objects or conditions. This information is generally captured by means of direct scoring, either in the form of a Likert or cardinal scale, or by comparative judgments in pairs or sets. In this sense, the use of pairwise comparisons is becoming increasingly popular because of the simplicity of this experimental procedure. However, this strategy requires non-trivial data analysis to aggregate the comparison ranks into a quality scale and analyse the results, in order to take full advantage of the collected data. This paper explains the process of translating pairwise comparison data into a measurement scale, discusses the benefits and limitations of such scaling methods and introduces a publicly available software in Matlab. We improve on existing scaling methods by introducing outlier analysis, providing methods for computing confidence intervals and statistical testing and introducing a prior, which reduces estimation error when the number of observers is low. Most of our examples focus on image quality assessment.

Code available at https://github.com/mantiuk/pwcmp

References in corpus (3)

• Models for Paired Comparison Data: A Review with Emphasis on Dependent Data
• Active Ranking using Pairwise Comparisons
• Just Sort It! A Simple and Effective Approach to Active Preference Learning

Cited by in corpus (7)

• Frequency Domain Loss Function for Deep Exposure Correction of Dark Images
• Predicting Engagement in Video Lectures
• Perceptual Visibility Model for Temporal Contrast Changes in Periphery
• Reinforced Labels: Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for Point-Feature Label Placement
• Subjective Annotation for a Frame Interpolation Benchmark using Artefact Amplification
• Subjective Image Quality Assessment with Boosted Triplet Comparisons
• Toward Expressive Singing Voice Correction: On Perceptual Validity of Evaluation Metrics for Vocal Melody Extraction