Explainable AI: Beware of Inmates Running the Asylum Or: How I Learnt to Stop Worrying and Love the Social and Behavioural Sciences
arXiv:1712.00547
Abstract
In his seminal book `The Inmates are Running the Asylum: Why High-Tech Products Drive Us Crazy And How To Restore The Sanity' [2004, Sams Indianapolis, IN, USA], Alan Cooper argues that a major reason why software is often poorly designed (from a user perspective) is that programmers are in charge of design decisions, rather than interaction designers. As a result, programmers design software for themselves, rather than for their target audience, a phenomenon he refers to as the `inmates running the asylum'. This paper argues that explainable AI risks a similar fate. While the re-emergence of explainable AI is positive, this paper argues most of us as AI researchers are building explanatory agents for ourselves, rather than for the intended users. But explainable AI is more likely to succeed if researchers and practitioners understand, adopt, implement, and improve models from the vast and valuable bodies of research in philosophy, psychology, and cognitive science, and if evaluation of these models is focused more on people than on technology. From a light scan of literature, we demonstrate that there is considerable scope to infuse more results from the social and behavioural sciences into explainable AI, and present some key results from these fields that are relevant to explainable AI.
IJCAI 2017 Workshop on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
References in corpus (1)
Cited by in corpus (24)
- What Do We Want From Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)? -- A Stakeholder Perspective on XAI and a Conceptual Model Guiding Interdisciplinary XAI Research
- Trustworthy AI and Robotics and the Implications for the AEC Industry: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Potentials
- How can I choose an explainer? An Application-grounded Evaluation of Post-hoc Explanations
- Sensible AI: Re-imagining Interpretability and Explainability using Sensemaking Theory
- Mediating Community-AI Interaction through Situated Explanation: The Case of AI-Led Moderation
- An Objective Metric for Explainable AI: How and Why to Estimate the Degree of Explainability
- Defining Explainable AI for Requirements Analysis
- Explanation Strategies as an Empirical-Analytical Lens for Socio-Technical Contextualization of Machine Learning Interpretability
- Human-Centered Explainable AI (XAI): From Algorithms to User Experiences
- Should We Trust (X)AI? Design Dimensions for Structured Experimental Evaluations
- Understanding Consumer Preferences for Explanations Generated by XAI Algorithms
- Play MNIST For Me! User Studies on the Effects of Post-Hoc, Example-Based Explanations & Error Rates on Debugging a Deep Learning, Black-Box Classifier
- Accessibility Scout: Personalized Accessibility Scans of Built Environments
- Teaching AI to Explain its Decisions Using Embeddings and Multi-Task Learning
- A Game-Based Approach for Helping Designers Learn Machine Learning Concepts
- Who is this Explanation for? Human Intelligence and Knowledge Graphs for eXplainable AI
- Readying Medical Students for Medical AI: The Need to Embed AI Ethics Education
- On Two XAI Cultures: A Case Study of Non-technical Explanations in Deployed AI System
- Explainable AI for medical imaging: Explaining pneumothorax diagnoses with Bayesian Teaching
- Teaching Solid Mechanics to Artificial Intelligence: a fast solver for heterogeneous solids
- A First Look: Towards Explainable TextVQA Models via Visual and Textual Explanations
- Making Things Explainable vs Explaining: Requirements and Challenges under the GDPR
- A User-Centred Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Human-Robot Interaction
- Explanation from Specification