Disturbed galaxy clusters are more abundant in an X-ray volume-limited sample
arXiv:1710.03814 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731854
Abstract
We present first strong observational evidence that the X-ray cool-core bias or the apparent bias in the abundance of relaxed clusters is absent in our REFLEX volume-limited sample (ReVols). We show that these previously observed biases are due to the survey selection method such as for an flux-limited survey, and are not due to the inherent nature of X-ray selection. We also find that the X-ray luminosity distributions of clusters for the relaxed and for the disturbed clusters are distinct and a displacement of approximately 60 per cent is required to match two distributions. Our results suggest that to achieve more precise scaling relation one may need to take the morphology of clusters and their fractional abundance into account.
arXiv commentA&A, 606, L4, 4 pages, 3 figures
References in corpus (13)
- Galaxy cluster X-ray luminosity scaling relations from a representative local sample (REXCESS)
- The Lx-T Relation and Temperature Function for Nearby Clusters Revisited
- The impact of mergers on relaxed X-ray clusters - I. Dynamical evolution and emergent transient structures
- Joint Analysis of Cluster Observations: II. Chandra/XMM-Newton X-ray and Weak Lensing Scaling Relations for a Sample of 50 Rich Clusters of Galaxies
- The Cool-Core Bias in X-ray Galaxy Cluster Samples I: Method And Application To HIFLUGCS
- Quantifying the Morphologies and Dynamical Evolution of Galaxy Clusters. I. The Method
- Substructure of the galaxy clusters in the REXCESS sample: observed statistics and comparison to numerical simulations
- The fraction of cool-core clusters in X-ray vs. SZ samples using Chandra observations
- The cool core state of Planck SZ-selected clusters versus X-ray selected samples: evidence for cool core bias
- The extended ROSAT-ESO Flux Limited X-ray Galaxy Cluster Survey (REFLEX II)\\ II. Construction and Properties of the Survey
- The ROSAT-ESO Flux Limited X-ray Galaxy Cluster Survey (REFLEX II) I. Newly identified X-ray luminous clusters at z>=0.2
- Statistics and implications of substructure detected in a representative sample of X-ray clusters
- The effect of AGN feedback on the X-ray morphologies of clusters -- simulations vs. observations
Cited by in corpus (15)
- The Three Hundred Project: Dynamical state of galaxy clusters and morphology from multi-wavelength synthetic maps
- The impact of the observed baryon distribution in haloes on the total matter power spectrum
- How frequent are close supermassive binary black holes in powerful jet sources?
- Optical Substructure and BCG Offsets of Sunyaev-Zel'dovich and X-ray Selected Galaxy Clusters
- Dynamical state of galaxy clusters evaluated from X-ray images
- How baryons can significantly bias cluster count cosmology
- The Most Massive galaxy Clusters (M2C) across cosmic time: link between radial total mass distribution and dynamical state
- ENISALA: II. Distinct Star Formation and Active Galactic Nucleus Activity in Merging and Relaxed Galaxy Clusters
- Hydrostatic Mass Profiles of Galaxy Clusters in the eROSITA Survey
- X-ray properties of high-richness CAMIRA clusters in the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program field
- Why are we still using 3D masses for cluster cosmology?
- Interaction of the massive cluster system Abell 3016/3017 embedded in a cosmic filament
- Scaling relations of X-ray Luminous Clusters in the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program Field
- Evolution of the degree of substructures in simulated galaxy clusters
- XMM-Newton study of six massive, X-ray luminous galaxy clusters systems in the redshift range z = 0.25 to 0.5