Parallel lives: A local-realistic interpretation of "nonlocal" boxes
arXiv:1709.10016 · doi:10.3390/e21010087
Abstract
We carry out a thought experiment in an imaginary world. Our world is both local and realistic, yet it violates a Bell inequality more than does quantum theory. This serves to debunk the myth that equates local realism with local hidden variables in the simplest possible manner. Along the way, we reinterpret the celebrated 1935 argument of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen, and come to the conclusion that they were right in their questioning the completeness of the Copenhagen version of quantum theory, provided one believes in a local-realistic universe. Throughout our journey, we strive to explain our views from first principles, without expecting mathematical sophistication nor specialized prior knowledge from the reader.
arXiv comment13 pages, 2 figures, 1 table. No changes in conclusions, but the correct attribution of each author's contribution is made explicit and minor improvements are made, including to the graphic-novel poster. This should be considered the authoritative version because the version published in Entropy could not be modified to include proper author attributions and we prefer our style over Entropy's
References in corpus (2)
Cited by in corpus (11)
- Law without law: from observer states to physics via algorithmic information theory
- Testing quantum theory with thought experiments
- Parallel lives: A local-realistic interpretation of "nonlocal" boxes
- A local-realistic model for quantum theory
- The Cost of Quantum Locality
- Taxonomy for Physics Beyond Quantum Mechanics
- An Elementary Proof That Everett's Quantum Multiverse Is Nonlocal: Bell-Locality and Branch-Symmetry in the Many-Worlds Interpretation
- Can parallel lives provide a solution to Hardy's paradox?
- Explaining Bell Locally
- The ABC of Deutsch-Hayden Descriptors
- On the significance of Wigner's Friend in contexts beyond quantum foundations