Judicial Review of Uncertain Risks in Scientific Research
arXiv:1709.06474 · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-32939-0_6
Abstract
It is difficult to neutrally evaluate the risks posed by large-scale leading-edge science experiments. Traditional risk assessment is problematic in this context for multiple reasons. Also, such experiments can be insulated from challenge by manipulating how questions of risk are framed. Yet courts can and must evaluate these risks. In this chapter, I suggest modes of qualitative reasoning to facilitate such evaluation.
arXiv comment19 pages; from the NeTWork Workshop 2013 conference, sponsored by FonCSI (Fondation pour une culture de sécurité industrielle), November 21-23, 2013 in Sorèze, France; entire book at https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-32939-0
References in corpus (7)
- Black Holes at the LHC
- High Energy Colliders as Black Hole Factories: The End of Short Distance Physics
- On the Universality of the Hawking Effect
- Astrophysical implications of hypothetical stable TeV-scale black holes
- Review of the Safety of LHC Collisions
- Comments on claimed risk from metastable black holes
- On the potential catastrophic risk from metastable quantum-black holes produced at particle colliders