Equivalence of weak and strong modes of measures on topological vector spaces

Abstract

A strong mode of a probability measure on a normed space $X$ can be defined as a point $u$ such that the mass of the ball centred at $u$ uniformly dominates the mass of all other balls in the small-radius limit. Helin and Burger weakened this definition by considering only pairwise comparisons with balls whose centres differ by vectors in a dense, proper linear subspace $E$ of $X$, and posed the question of when these two types of modes coincide. We show that, in a more general setting of metrisable vector spaces equipped with measures that are finite on bounded sets, the density of $E$ and a uniformity condition suffice for the equivalence of these two types of modes. We accomplish this by introducing a new, intermediate type of mode. We also show that these modes can be inequivalent if the uniformity condition fails. Our results shed light on the relationships between among various notions of maximum a posteriori estimator in non-parametric Bayesian inference.

22 pages, 3 figures

References in corpus (2)

• Sparsity-promoting and edge-preserving maximum a posteriori estimators in non-parametric Bayesian inverse problems
• Patch-Ordering as a Regularization for Inverse Problems in Image Processing

Cited by in corpus (6)

• Γ-convergence of Onsager-Machlup functionals. Part I: With applications to maximum a posteriori estimation in Bayesian inverse problems
• Γ-convergence of Onsager-Machlup functionals. Part II: Infinite product measures on Banach spaces
• Maximum a posteriori estimators in ${\ell }^p$ are well-defined for diagonal Gaussian priors
• An order-theoretic perspective on modes and maximum a posteriori estimation in Bayesian inverse problems
• Are minimizers of the Onsager-Machlup functional strong posterior modes?
• Strong maximum a posteriori estimation in Banach spaces with Gaussian priors