Society-in-the-Loop: Programming the Algorithmic Social Contract
arXiv:1707.07232 · doi:10.1007/s10676-017-9430-8
Abstract
Recent rapid advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning have raised many questions about the regulatory and governance mechanisms for autonomous machines. Many commentators, scholars, and policy-makers now call for ensuring that algorithms governing our lives are transparent, fair, and accountable. Here, I propose a conceptual framework for the regulation of AI and algorithmic systems. I argue that we need tools to program, debug and maintain an algorithmic social contract, a pact between various human stakeholders, mediated by machines. To achieve this, we can adapt the concept of human-in-the-loop (HITL) from the fields of modeling and simulation, and interactive machine learning. In particular, I propose an agenda I call society-in-the-loop (SITL), which combines the HITL control paradigm with mechanisms for negotiating the values of various stakeholders affected by AI systems, and monitoring compliance with the agreement. In short, `SITL = HITL + Social Contract.'
(in press), Ethics of Information Technology, 2017
References in corpus (3)
Cited by in corpus (17)
- Auditing large language models: a three-layered approach
- Ethics-Based Auditing of Automated Decision-Making Systems: Nature, Scope, and Limitations
- Designing for Human Rights in AI
- Jury Learning: Integrating Dissenting Voices into Machine Learning Models
- Machine Culture
- Human Perceptions on Moral Responsibility of AI: A Case Study in AI-Assisted Bail Decision-Making
- Ethics-Based Auditing of Automated Decision-Making Systems: Intervention Points and Policy Implications
- The Key Concepts of Ethics of Artificial Intelligence - A Keyword based Systematic Mapping Study
- Ethics of Technology needs more Political Philosophy
- Canada Protocol: an ethical checklist for the use of Artificial Intelligence in Suicide Prevention and Mental Health
- Toward a Rational and Ethical Sociotechnical System of Autonomous Vehicles: A Novel Application of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
- The Conflict Between People's Urge to Punish AI and Legal Systems
- The Value-Sensitive Conversational Agent Co-Design Framework
- The Switch, the Ladder, and the Matrix: Models for Classifying AI Systems
- Disciplining Deliberation: A Sociotechnical Perspective on Machine Learning Trade-offs
- A Labeling Task Design for Supporting Algorithmic Needs: Facilitating Worker Diversity and Reducing AI Bias
- Organizational Practices and Socio-Technical Design of Human-Centered AI