Detector sampling of optical/IR spectra: how many pixels per FWHM?

Abstract

Most optical and IR spectra are now acquired using detectors with finite-width pixels in a square array. This paper examines the effects of such pixellation, using computed simulations to illustrate the effects which most concern the astronomer end-user. Coarse sampling increases the random noise errors in wavelength by typically 10 - 20% at 2 pixels/FWHM, but with wide variation depending on the functional form of the instrumental Line Spread Function (LSF) and on the pixel phase. Line widths are even more strongly affected at low sampling frequencies. However, the noise in fitted peak amplitudes is minimally affected. Pixellation has a substantial but complex effect on the ability to see a relative minimum between two closely-spaced peaks (or relative maximum between two absorption lines). The consistent scale of resolving power presented by Robertson (2013) is extended to cover pixellated spectra. The systematic bias errors in wavelength introduced by pixellation are examined. While they may be negligible for smooth well-sampled symmetric LSFs, they are very sensitive to asymmetry and high spatial frequency substructure. The Modulation Transfer Function for sampled data is shown to give a useful indication of the extent of improperly sampled signal in an LSF. The common maxim that 2 pixels/FWHM is the Nyquist limit is incorrect and most LSFs will exhibit some aliasing at this sample frequency. While 2 pixels/FWHM is often an acceptable minimum for moderate signal/noise work, it is preferable to carry out simulations for any actual or proposed LSF to find the effects of sampling frequency. Where end-users have a choice of sampling frequencies, through on-chip binning and/or spectrograph configurations, the instrument user manual should include an examination of their effects. (Abridged)

arXiv comment22 pages, 37 figures. Accepted for publication in PASA

References in corpus (11)

• Drizzle: A Method for the Linear Reconstruction of Undersampled Images
• Toward High-Precision Astrometry with WFPC2. I. Deriving an Accurate PSF
• The brighter-fatter effect and pixel correlations in CCD sensors
• Combining Undersampled Dithered Images
• The Photometry of Undersampled Point Spread Functions
• Sub-Pixel Response Measurement of Near-Infrared Sensors
• Quantifying resolving power in astronomical spectra
• A New Method for Band-limited Imaging with Undersampled Detectors
• Precision Astronomy with Imperfect Fully Depleted CCDs -- An Introduction and a Suggested Lexicon
• Pixel area variations in sensors: a novel framework for predicting pixel fidelity and distortion in flat field response
• An Algorithm for Precise Aperture Photometry of Critically Sampled Images

Cited by in corpus (11)

• SDSS-IV MaNGA: Modeling the Spectral Line Spread Function to Sub-Percent Accuracy
• Ultra-Diffuse Galaxies in the Perseus Cluster: Comparing Galaxy Properties with Globular Cluster System Richness
• On the Stellar Kinematics and Mass of the Virgo Ultra-Diffuse Galaxy VCC 1287
• Forecasting Chemical Abundance Precision for Extragalactic Stellar Archaeology
• Superresolution Reconstruction of Severely Undersampled Point-spread Functions Using Point-source Stacking and Deconvolution
• The Utility of Lyman-alpha Emission Lines as a Probe of Interactions between High Redshift Galaxies and their Environments
• Revisiting the Emission Line Source Detection Problem in Integral Field Spectroscopic Data
• Key wavefront sensors features for laser-assisted tomographic adaptive optics systems on the Extremely Large Telescope
• VLT/MUSE and ATCA observations of the host galaxy of the short GRB 080905A at z=0.122
• Centroiding Undersampled PSFs with a Lookup Table
• HOLISMOKES -- XVIII. Cosmology with strongly lensed type II supernovae: Effects of instrumental setups on $H_0$