The structure of tame minimal dynamical systems for general groups
arXiv:1707.00150 · doi:10.1007/s00222-017-0747-z
Abstract
We use the structure theory of minimal dynamical systems to show that, for a general group , a tame, metric, minimal dynamical system has the following structure: \begin{equation*} \xymatrix {& \tilde{X} \ar[dd]_π\ar[dl]_η& X^* \ar[l]_-{θ^*} \ar[d]^ι \ar@/^2pc/@{>}^{π^*}[dd]\\ X & & Z \ar[d]^σ\\ & Y & Y^* \ar[l]^θ} \end{equation*} Here (i) is a metric minimal and tame system (ii) is a strongly proximal extension, (iii) is a strongly proximal system, (iv) is a point distal and RIM extension with unique section, (v) , and are almost one-to-one extensions, and (vi) is an isometric extension. When the map is also open this diagram reduces to \begin{equation*} \xymatrix {& \tilde{X} \ar[dl]_η\ar[d]^ι \ar@/^2pc/@{>}^π[dd]\\ X & Z \ar[d]^σ\\ & Y } \end{equation*} In general the presence of the strongly proximal extension is unavoidable. If the system admits an invariant measure then is trivial and is an almost automorphic system; i.e. , where is an almost one-to-one extension and is equicontinuous. Moreover, is unique and is a measure theoretical isomorphism , with the Haar measure on . Thus, this is always the case when is amenable.
27 pages; to appear in Invent. Math. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:math/0609503
References in corpus (1)
Cited by in corpus (11)
- Group actions on treelike compact spaces
- On tameness of almost automorphic dynamical systems for general groups
- Combinatorial independence and naive entropy
- Mean equicontinuity, almost automorphy and regularity
- Tame or wild Toeplitz shifts
- Amorphic complexity of group actions with applications to quasicrystals
- Null actions and RIM non-open extensions of strongly proximal actions
- On non-tameness of the Ellis semigroup
- Some examples of tame dynamical systems answering questions of Glasner and Megrelishvili
- Minimal systems with finitely many ergodic measures
- Topology and Topological Sequence Entropy