Deep Optical Imaging of the COSMOS Field with Hyper Suprime-Cam Using Data from the Subaru Strategic Program and the University of Hawaii
arXiv:1706.00566
Abstract
We present the deepest optical images of the COSMOS field based on a joint dataset taken with Hyper Suprime-Cam (HSC) by the HSC Subaru Strategic Program (SSP) team and the University of Hawaii (UH). The COSMOS field is one of the key extragalactic fields with a wealth of deep, multi-wavelength data. However, the current optical data are not sufficiently deep to match with, e.g., the UltraVista data in the near-infrared. The SSP team and UH have joined forces to produce very deep optical images of the COSMOS field by combining data from both teams. The coadd images reach depths of g=27.8, r=27.7, i=27.6, z=26.8, and y=26.2 mag at 5 sigma for point sources based on flux uncertainties quoted by the pipeline and they cover essentially the entire COSMOS 2 square degree field. The seeing is between 0.6 and 0.9 arcsec on the coadds. We perform several quality checks and confirm that the data are of science quality; ~2% photometry and 30 mas astrometry. This accuracy is identical to the Public Data Release 1 from HSC-SSP. We make the joint dataset including fully calibrated catalogs of detected objects available to the community at https://hsc-release.mtk.nao.ac.jp/.
arXiv comment10 pages, 6 figures. Data available at https://hsc-release.mtk.nao.ac.jp/
References in corpus (3)
Cited by in corpus (7)
- The DEIMOS 10k spectroscopic survey catalog of the COSMOS field
- Deep Extragalactic VIsible Legacy Survey (DEVILS): Motivation, Design and Target Catalogue
- The molecular gas content and fuel efficiency of starbursts at z ~ 1.6 with ALMA
- Panchromatic SED modelling of spatially-resolved galaxies
- A clustering-based self-calibration of the richness-to-mass relation of CAMIRA galaxy clusters out to in the Hyper Suprime-Cam survey
- Concurrent starbursts in molecular gas disks within a pair of colliding galaxies at z = 1.52
- Hawaii Two-0: High-redshift galaxy clustering and bias