Crowdsourcing Ground Truth for Medical Relation Extraction

Abstract

Cognitive computing systems require human labeled data for evaluation, and often for training. The standard practice used in gathering this data minimizes disagreement between annotators, and we have found this results in data that fails to account for the ambiguity inherent in language. We have proposed the CrowdTruth method for collecting ground truth through crowdsourcing, that reconsiders the role of people in machine learning based on the observation that disagreement between annotators provides a useful signal for phenomena such as ambiguity in the text. We report on using this method to build an annotated data set for medical relation extraction for the $cause$ and $treat$ relations, and how this data performed in a supervised training experiment. We demonstrate that by modeling ambiguity, labeled data gathered from crowd workers can (1) reach the level of quality of domain experts for this task while reducing the cost, and (2) provide better training data at scale than distant supervision. We further propose and validate new weighted measures for precision, recall, and F-measure, that account for ambiguity in both human and machine performance on this task.

Accepted for publication in ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS) Special Issue on Human-Centered Machine Learning

References in corpus (1)

• Exposing ambiguities in a relation-extraction gold standard with crowdsourcing

Cited by in corpus (11)

• Metrology for AI: From Benchmarks to Instruments
• Crowdsourcing subjective annotations using pairwise comparisons reduces bias and error compared to the majority-vote method
• Adversarial Learning for Chinese NER from Crowd Annotations
• Goldilocks: Consistent Crowdsourced Scalar Annotations with Relative Uncertainty
• Judgment Sieve: Reducing Uncertainty in Group Judgments through Interventions Targeting Ambiguity versus Disagreement
• Empirical Methodology for Crowdsourcing Ground Truth
• POTATO: exPlainable infOrmation exTrAcTion framewOrk
• Learning from Imperfect Annotations
• Variational Bayesian Inference for Crowdsourcing Predictions
• Perils of Label Indeterminacy: A Case Study on Prediction of Neurological Recovery After Cardiac Arrest
• Predicting Annotation Difficulty to Improve Task Routing and Model Performance for Biomedical Information Extraction