paper

On the Complexity of Restoring Corrupted Colorings

arXiv:1701.01939

Abstract

In the \probrFix problem, we are given a graph , a (non-proper) vertex-coloring , and a positive integer . The goal is to decide whether a proper -coloring is obtainable from by recoloring at most vertices of . Recently, Junosza-Szaniawski, Liedloff, and Rz{ą}{ż}ewski [SOFSEM 2015] asked whether the problem has a polynomial kernel parameterized by the number of recolorings . In a full version of the manuscript, the authors together with Garnero and Montealegre, answered the question in the negative: for every , the problem \probrFix does not admit a polynomial kernel unless $\NP \subseteq \coNP / \poly$. Independently of their work, we give an alternative proof of the theorem. Furthermore, we study the complexity of \probrFixSwap, where the only difference from \probrFix is that instead of recolorings we have a budget of color swaps. We show that for every , the problem \probrFixSwap is $\W[1]$-hard whereas \probrFix is known to be FPT. Moreover, when is part of the input, we observe both \probFix and \probFixSwap are $\W[1]$-hard parameterized by treewidth. We also study promise variants of the problems, where we are guaranteed that a proper -coloring is indeed obtainable from by some finite number of swaps. For instance, we prove that for , the problems \probrFixPromise and \probrFixSwapPromise are $\NP$-hard for planar graphs. As a consequence of our reduction, the problems cannot be solved in time unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) fails.

14 pages, 3 figures