Performance of group testing algorithms with near-constant tests-per-item
arXiv:1612.07122 · doi:10.1109/TIT.2018.2861772
Abstract
We consider the nonadaptive group testing with N items, of which are defective. We study a test design in which each item appears in nearly the same number of tests. For each item, we independently pick L tests uniformly at random with replacement, and place the item in those tests. We analyse the performance of these designs with simple and practical decoding algorithms in a range of sparsity regimes, and show that the performance is consistently improved in comparison with standard Bernoulli designs. We show that our new design requires 23% fewer tests than a Bernoulli design when paired with the simple decoding algorithms known as COMP and DD. This gives the best known nonadaptive group testing performance for , and the best proven performance with a practical decoding algorithm for all . We also give a converse result showing that the DD algorithm is optimal for these designs when .
16 pages, 2 figures. This work was presented in part at the 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory: arXiv:1602.03471
References in corpus (5)
- Improved Adaptive Group Testing Algorithms with Applications to Multiple Access Channels and Dead Sensor Diagnosis
- Group testing with Random Pools: Phase Transitions and Optimal Strategy
- The capacity of Bernoulli nonadaptive group testing
- Improved group testing rates with constant column weight designs
- On the optimality of some group testing algorithms
Cited by in corpus (11)
- Individual testing is optimal for nonadaptive group testing in the linear regime
- Information-theoretic and algorithmic thresholds for group testing
- Optimal group testing
- Improved bounds for noisy group testing with constant tests per item
- Pooled testing to isolate infected individuals
- On the All-Or-Nothing Behavior of Bernoulli Group Testing
- Model-Based and Graph-Based Priors for Group Testing
- Noisy Non-Adaptive Group Testing: A (Near-)Definite Defectives Approach
- Noisy group testing via spatial coupling
- Small error algorithms for tropical group testing
- A negative binomial approximation in group testing