A critical review of statistical calibration/prediction models handling data inconsistency and model inadequacy
arXiv:1611.04376 · doi:10.1002/aic.15781
Abstract
Inference of physical parameters from reference data is a well studied problem with many intricacies (inconsistent sets of data due to experimental systematic errors, approximate physical models...). The complexity is further increased when the inferred parameters are used to make predictions (virtual measurements) because parameters uncertainty has to be estimated in addition to parameters best value. The literature is rich in statistical models for the calibration/prediction problem, each having benefits and limitations. We review and evaluate standard and state-of-the-art statistical models in a common bayesian framework, and test them on synthetic and real datasets of temperature-dependent viscosity for the calibration of Lennard-Jones parameters of a Chapman-Enskog model.
References in corpus (3)
Cited by in corpus (18)
- Augmenting Physical Models with Deep Networks for Complex Dynamics Forecasting
- Reliable estimation of prediction uncertainty for physico-chemical property models
- Universal QM/MM Approaches for General Nanoscale Applications
- Mechanism Deduction from Noisy Chemical Reaction Networks
- Error Assessment of Computational Models in Chemistry
- The parameters uncertainty inflation fallacy
- Statistical Analysis of Semiclassical Dispersion Corrections
- The long road to calibrated prediction uncertainty in computational chemistry
- Molecule-specific Uncertainty Quantification in Quantum Chemical Studies
- Prediction uncertainty validation for computational chemists
- Bayesian Calibration of Force-fields from Experimental Data: TIP4P Water
- Uncertainty quantification for classical effective potentials: an extension to potfit
- Calibration in Machine Learning Uncertainty Quantification: beyond consistency to target adaptivity
- Bayesian Modeling of Inconsistent Plastic Response due to Material Variability
- Modeling strength and failure variability due to porosity in additively manufactured metals
- Embedded Model Error Representation for Bayesian Model Calibration
- Heuristics and Uncertainty Quantification in Rational and Inverse Compound and Catalyst Design
- Embedded Model Form Uncertainty Quantification with Measurement Noise for Bayesian Model Calibration