Crowdsourced science: sociotechnical epistemology in the e-research paradigm
arXiv:1610.09485 · doi:10.1007/s11229-016-1238-2
Abstract
Recent years have seen a surge in online collaboration between experts and amateurs on scientific research. In this article, we analyse the epistemological implications of these crowdsourced projects, with a focus on Zooniverse, the world's largest citizen science web portal. We use quantitative methods to evaluate the platform's success in producing large volumes of observation statements and high impact scientific discoveries relative to more conventional means of data processing. Through empirical evidence, Bayesian reasoning, and conceptual analysis, we show how information and communication technologies enhance the reliability, scalability, and connectivity of crowdsourced e-research, giving online citizen science projects powerful epistemic advantages over more traditional modes of scientific investigation. These results highlight the essential role played by technologically mediated social interaction in contemporary knowledge production. We conclude by calling for an explicitly sociotechnical turn in the philosophy of science that combines insights from statistics and logic to analyse the latest developments in scientific research.
Synthese, October 2016
References in corpus (7)
- Galaxy Zoo 1 : Data Release of Morphological Classifications for nearly 900,000 galaxies
- Galaxy Zoo: the dependence of morphology and colour on environment
- A Catalogue of Morphologically Classified Galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: North Equatorial Region
- Galaxy Zoo: The large-scale spin statistics of spiral galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
- PHAT Stellar Cluster Survey. II. Andromeda Project Cluster Catalog
- Galaxy Zoo: Morphological Classification and Citizen Science
- Dynamic Bayesian Combination of Multiple Imperfect Classifiers