Which-way double slit experiments and Born rule violation
arXiv:1610.06401 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.95.042129
Abstract
In which-way double-slit experiments with perfect detectors, it is assumed that having a second detector at the slits is redundant, as it will not change the interference pattern. We however show that if higher-order or non-classical paths are accounted for, the presence of the second detector will have an effect on the interference pattern. Accounting for these non-classical paths also means that the Sorkin parameter in triple-slit experiments is only an approximate measure of Born rule violation. Using the difference between single and double which-way detectors, we give an alternative parameter which is an exact measure of Born rule violation.
7 pages, 4 figures
References in corpus (6)
- Atom Interferometers
- Higher-order interference and single-system postulates characterizing quantum theory
- Obtaining tight bounds on higher-order interferences with a 5-path interferometer
- Three path interference using nuclear magnetic resonance: a test of the consistency of Born's rule
- Higher-order interference in extensions of quantum theory
- Experimental Test of Born's Rule by Inspecting Third-Order Quantum Interference on a Single Spin in Solids
Cited by in corpus (5)
- Exotic looped trajectories via quantum marking
- Sorkin parameter for type-I spontaneous parametric down-conversion biphotons and matter waves
- Significant nonclassical paths with atoms and cavities in the double-slit experiment
- Derive the Born's rule from environment-induced stochastic dynamics of wave-functions in an open system
- The cognitive triple-slit experiment