Reply to "Comment on "Critical Point Scaling of Ising Spin Glasses in a Magnetic Field" "

Abstract

In his Comment, Temesvári objects to a remark in our paper [Phys.\ Rev.\ B {\bf 91}, 104432 (2015)] that his result for the form of the Almeida-Thouless (AT) line obtained in an earlier paper with Parisi [Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 858}, 293 (2012)] in six dimensions can be obtained by taking the limit of $d\to 6$ in the equations valid for $d>6$, but that this violated one of the inequalities needed for their validity. He is just pointing out that they gave a derivation of the form of the AT line in six dimensions in [Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 858}, 293 (2012)] which avoided this difficulty. However, it is still a perturbative approach, and does not deal with the lack of a perturbative fixed point found by Bray and Roberts [J. Phys. C {\bf 13}, 5405 (1980)] long ago.

To appear in Physical Review B; Reply to arXiv:1610.04747

References in corpus (2)

• Critical Point Scaling of Ising Spin Glasses in a Magnetic Field
• Comment on "Critical point scaling of Ising spin glasses in a magnetic field" by J. Yeo and M.A. Moore