paper

Products of several commutators in a Lie nilpotent associative algebra

arXiv:1610.03136 · doi:10.1142/S0218196717500473

Abstract

Let be a field of characteristic and let be a unital associative -algebra. Define a left-normed commutator recursively by , . For , let be the two-sided ideal in generated by all commutators (. Define . Let be integers such that , . Let be positive integers such that of them are odd and of them are even. Let . The aim of the present note is to show that, for any positive integers , in general, \[ T^{(m_1)} (A) \dots T^{(m_k)} (A) \nsubseteq T^{(N_{k \ell} +1)} (A). \] It is known that if (that is, if at least one of is even) then, for each , \begin{equation*} \label{evenabstr} T^{(m_1)} (A) \dots T^{(m_k)} (A) \subseteq T^{(N_{k \ell} )} (A) \end{equation*} so our result cannot be improved if . Let . Recently Dangovski has proved that if are any positive integers then, in general, \[ T^{(m_1)} (A) \dots T^{(m_k)} (A) \nsubseteq T^{(N_k+1)} (A) . \] Since , Dangovski's result is stronger than ours if and is weaker than ours if ; if then so both results coincide. It is known that if (that is, if all are odd) then, for each , \begin{equation*} \label{alloddabstr} T^{(m_1)} (A) \dots T^{(m_k)} (A) \subseteq T^{(N_k)} (A) \end{equation*} so in this case Dangovski's result cannot be improved.

9 pages; v.2: abstract improved, typos fixed; v.3: change of the title, minor changes in notation