Toward a history of mathematics focused on procedures
arXiv:1609.04531 · doi:10.1007/s10699-016-9498-3
Abstract
Abraham Robinson's framework for modern infinitesimals was developed half a century ago. It enables a re-evaluation of the procedures of the pioneers of mathematical analysis. Their procedures have been often viewed through the lens of the success of the Weierstrassian foundations. We propose a view without passing through the lens, by means of proxies for such procedures in the modern theory of infinitesimals. The real accomplishments of calculus and analysis had been based primarily on the elaboration of novel techniques for solving problems rather than a quest for ultimate foundations. It may be hopeless to interpret historical foundations in terms of a punctiform continuum, but arguably it is possible to interpret historical techniques and procedures in terms of modern ones. Our proposed formalisations do not mean that Fermat, Gregory, Leibniz, Euler, and Cauchy were pre-Robinsonians, but rather indicate that Robinson's framework is more helpful in understanding their procedures than a Weierstrassian framework.
30 pages, to appear in Foundations of Science
References in corpus (6)
- Leibniz's Infinitesimals: Their Fictionality, Their Modern Implementations, And Their Foes From Berkeley To Russell And Beyond
- Ten Misconceptions from the History of Analysis and Their Debunking
- Leibniz's Laws of Continuity and Homogeneity
- A Cauchy-Dirac delta function
- Infinitesimals, Imaginaries, Ideals, and Fictions
- A non-standard analysis of a cultural icon: The case of Paul Halmos
Cited by in corpus (9)
- Procedures of Leibnizian infinitesimal calculus: An account in three modern frameworks
- Cauchy's infinitesimals, his sum theorem, and foundational paradigms
- Gregory's sixth operation
- Cauchy, infinitesimals and ghosts of departed quantifiers
- From Pythagoreans and Weierstrassians to true infinitesimal calculus
- Continuity between Cauchy and Bolzano: Issues of antecedents and priority
- Mathematical conquerors, Unguru polarity, and the task of history
- Fermat's dilemma: Why did he keep mum on infinitesimals? and the European theological context
- Infinitesimals via Cauchy sequences: Refining the classical equivalence