A Priori Assessment of Prediction Confidence for Data-Driven Turbulence Modeling

Abstract

Although Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations are still the dominant tool for engineering design and analysis applications involving turbulent flows, standard RANS models are known to be unreliable in many flows of engineering relevance, including flows with separation, strong pressure gradients or mean flow curvature. With increasing amounts of 3-dimensional experimental data and high fidelity simulation data from Large Eddy Simulation (LES) and Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS), data-driven turbulence modeling has become a promising approach to increase the predictive capability of RANS simulations. Recently, a data-driven turbulence modeling approach via machine learning has been proposed to predict the Reynolds stress anisotropy of a given flow based on high fidelity data from closely related flows. In this work, the closeness of different flows is investigated to assess the prediction confidence a priori. Specifically, the Mahalanobis distance and the kernel density estimation (KDE) technique are used as metrics to quantify the distance between flow data sets in feature space. The flow over periodic hills at Re=10595 is used as the test set and seven flows with different configurations are individually used as training set. The results show that the prediction error of the Reynolds stress anisotropy is positively correlated with Mahalanobis distance and KDE distance, demonstrating that both extrapolation metrics can be used to estimate the prediction confidence a priori. A quantitative comparison using correlation coefficients shows that the Mahalanobis distance is less accurate in estimating the prediction confidence than KDE distance. The extrapolation metrics introduced in this work and the corresponding analysis provide an approach to aid in the choice of the data source and to assess the prediction confidence for data-driven turbulence modeling.

31 pages, 13 figures

References in corpus (2)

• A Physics Informed Machine Learning Approach for Reconstructing Reynolds Stress Modeling Discrepancies Based on DNS Data
• Quantifying and Reducing Model-Form Uncertainties in Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Simulations: A Data-Driven, Physics-Based Bayesian Approach

Cited by in corpus (12)

• A Comprehensive Physics-Informed Machine Learning Framework for Predictive Turbulence Modeling
• Physics-Informed Machine Learning Approach for Augmenting Turbulence Models: A Comprehensive Framework
• Quantifying model form uncertainty in Reynolds-averaged turbulence models with Bayesian deep neural networks
• Prediction of Reynolds Stresses in High-Mach-Number Turbulent Boundary Layers using Physics-Informed Machine Learning
• HiDeNN-PGD: reduced-order hierarchical deep learning neural networks
• Turbulence closure modeling with data-driven techniques: physical compatibility and consistency considerations
• Uncertainty Quantification for Data-driven Turbulence Modelling with Mondrian Forests
• Space-dependent Aggregation of Stochastic Data-driven Turbulence Models
• On identification of self-similar characteristics using the Tensor Train decomposition method with application to channel turbulence flow
• Evaluation of physics constrained data-driven methods for turbulence model uncertainty quantification
• Review of Physics-based and Data-driven Multiscale Simulation Methods for Computational Fluid Dynamics and Nuclear Thermal Hydraulics
• Turbulence closure modeling with data-driven techniques: Investigation of generalizable deep neural networks