Models of the Chisholm set
arXiv:1607.02189
Abstract
We give a counter-example showing that Carmo and Jones' condition 5(e) may conflict with other conditions on the models in their paper \emph{A new approach to contrary-to-duty obligations}.
Paper for Filosofi hovedfag spesialområde 1 exam, University of Oslo, Fall 1996. First cited in Carmo and Jones, Deontic logic and contrary-to-duties, Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 2002, footnote 28