Dynamic Atomic Congestion Games with Seasonal Flows
arXiv:1606.05691 · doi:10.1287/opre.2017.1683
Abstract
We propose a model of discrete time dynamic congestion games with atomic players and a single source-destination pair. The latencies of edges are composed by free-flow transit times and possible queuing time due to capacity constraints. We give a precise description of the dynamics induced by the individual strategies of players and of the corresponding costs, either when the traffic is controlled by a planner, or when players act selfishly. In parallel networks, optimal and equilibrium behavior eventually coincides, but the selfish behavior of the first players has consequences that cannot be undone and are paid by all future generations. In more general topologies, our main contributions are three-fold. First, we show that equilibria are usually not unique. In particular, we prove that there exists a sequence of networks such that the price of anarchy is equal to , where is the number of vertices, and the price of stability is equal to 1. Second, we illustrate a new dynamic version of Braess's paradox: the presence of initial queues in a network may decrease the long-run costs in equilibrium. This paradox may arise even in networks for which no Braess's paradox was previously known. Third, we propose an extension to model seasonalities by assuming that departure flows fluctuate periodically over time. We introduce a measure that captures the queues induced by periodicity of inflows. This measure is the increase in costs compared to uniform departures for optimal and equilibrium flows in parallel networks.
61 pages, 17 figures
Cited by in corpus (6)
- A Finite Time Combinatorial Algorithm for Instantaneous Dynamic Equilibrium Flows
- Stability analysis of a departure time choice problem with atomic vehicle models
- The Price of Anarchy for Instantaneous Dynamic Equilibria
- Continuity, Uniqueness and Long-Term Behavior of Nash Flows Over Time
- Convergence of a Packet Routing Model to Flows Over Time
- When Smoothness is Not Enough: Toward Exact Quantification and Optimization of the Price of Anarchy