The Mathematical Intelligencer flunks the Olympics
arXiv:1606.00160 · doi:10.1007/s10699-016-9485-8
Abstract
The Mathematical Intelligencer recently published a note by Y. Sergeyev that challenges both mathematics and intelligence. We examine Sergeyev's claims concerning his purported Infinity computer. We compare his grossone system with the classical Levi-Civita fields and with the hyperreal framework of A. Robinson, and analyze the related algorithmic issues inevitably arising in any genuine computer implementation. We show that Sergeyev's grossone system is unnecessary and vague, and that whatever consistent subsystem could be salvaged is subsumed entirely within a stronger and clearer system (IST). Lou Kauffman, who published an article on a grossone, places it squarely outside the historical panorama of ideas dealing with infinity and infinitesimals.
25 pages, published in Foundations of Science (online first)
References in corpus (8)
- Leibniz's Infinitesimals: Their Fictionality, Their Modern Implementations, And Their Foes From Berkeley To Russell And Beyond
- The exact (up to infinitesimals) infinite perimeter of the Koch snowflake and its finite area
- Who Gave you the Cauchy-Weierstrass Tale? The Dual History of Rigorous Calculus
- Tools, objects, and chimeras: Connes on the role of hyperreals in mathematics
- Leibniz's Laws of Continuity and Homogeneity
- Commuting and noncommuting infinitesimals
- Euler's lute and Edwards' oud
- Edward Nelson (1932-2014)