Feedback Between Motion and Sensation Provides Nonlinear Boost in Run-and-tumble Navigation

Abstract

Many organisms navigate gradients by alternating straight motions (runs) with random reorientations (tumbles), transiently suppressing tumbles whenever attractant signal increases. This induces a functional coupling between movement and sensation, since tumbling probability is controlled by the internal state of the organism which, in turn, depends on previous signal levels. Although a negative feedback tends to maintain this internal state close to adapted levels, positive feedback can arise when motion up the gradient reduces tumbling probability, further boosting drift up the gradient. Importantly, such positive feedback can drive large fluctuations in the internal state, complicating analytical approaches. Previous studies focused on what happens when the negative feedback dominates the dynamics. By contrast, we show here that there is a large portion of physiologically-relevant parameter space where the positive feedback can dominate, even when gradients are relatively shallow. We demonstrate how large transients emerge because of non-normal dynamics (non-orthogonal eigenvectors near a stable fixed point) inherent in the positive feedback, and further identify a fundamental nonlinearity that strongly amplifies their effect. Most importantly, this amplification is asymmetric, elongating runs in favorable directions and abbreviating others. The result is a "ratchet-like" gradient climbing behavior with drift speeds that can approach half the maximum run speed of the organism. Our results thus show that the classical drawback of run-and-tumble navigation --- wasteful runs in the wrong direction --- can be mitigated by exploiting the non-normal dynamics implicit in the run-and-tumble strategy.

arXiv comment22 pages, 3 figures, and 8 pages of SI

References in corpus (8)

• The Bacterial Chemotactic Response Reflects a Compromise Between Transient and Steady State Behavior
• Nonnormal amplification in random balanced neuronal networks
• Limits of feedback control in bacterial chemotaxis
• Non-genetic diversity modulates population performance
• Chemotactic response and adaptation dynamics in Escherichia coli
• Signalling noise enhances chemotactic drift of E. coli
• Predicting chemical environments of bacteria from receptor signaling
• Physical Limits on Bacterial Navigation in Dynamic Environments

Cited by in corpus (13)

• E. coli chemotaxis is information-limited
• Bacteria push the limits of chemotactic precision to navigate dynamic chemical gradients
• A connection between bacterial chemotactic network and optimal filtering
• Optimal sensing and control of run-and-tumble chemotaxis
• Drift and behavior of E. coli cells
• Effect of receptor clustering on chemotactic performance of Escherichia coli: sensing versus adaptation
• Run-and-tumble chemotaxis using reinforcement learning
• Effect of receptor cooperativity on methylation dynamics in bacterial chemotaxis with weak and strong gradient
• Transient drift of Escherichia coli under diffusing Step nutrient profile
• Remark on the Entropy Production of Adaptive Run-and-Tumble Chemotaxis
• Bacterial Chemotaxis in a Traveling Wave Attractant Environment
• Chemotaxing E. coli do not count single molecules
• Dynamics of chemo-receptor activity with time-periodic attractant field