Physical limits to magnetogenetics
arXiv:1604.01359 · doi:10.7554/eLife.17210
Abstract
This is an analysis of how magnetic fields affect biological molecules and cells. It was prompted by a series of prominent reports regarding magnetism in biological systems. The first claims to have identified a protein complex that acts like a compass needle to guide magnetic orientation in animals (Qin et al., 2016). Two other articles report magnetic control of membrane conductance by attaching ferritin to an ion channel protein and then tugging the ferritin or heating it with a magnetic field (Stanley et al., 2015; Wheeler et al., 2016). Here I argue that these claims conflict with basic laws of physics. The discrepancies are large: from 5 to 10 log units. If the reported phenomena do in fact occur, they must have causes entirely different from the ones proposed by the authors. The paramagnetic nature of protein complexes is found to seriously limit their utility for engineering magnetically sensitive cells.
14 pages, 2 figures. Revision includes analysis of magnetic heating of ferritin constructs. Spoiler alert: also implausible
Cited by in corpus (10)
- The sensitivity of a radical pair compass magnetoreceptor can be significantly amplified by radical scavengers
- Are theoretical results 'Results'?
- Magnetic Noise Enabled Biocompass
- Role of atomic spin-mechanical coupling in the problem of magnetic biocompass
- Sulfobetaine-Phosphonate Block Copolymer Coated Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for Genomic Locus Targeting and Magnetic Micromanipulation in the Nucleus of Living Cells
- Non-equilibrium, weak-field induced magnetism: a mechanism for magnetobiology
- Einstein-de Haas effect: a bridge linking mechanics, magnetism, and topology
- Unexpectedly super strong paramagnetism of aromatic peptides due to cations of divalent metals
- Compass-free migratory navigation
- A Proposal for an Electron-Transfer Mechanism of Avian Magnetoreception