Quantum Errors and Disturbances: Response to Busch, Lahti and Werner

Abstract

Busch, Lahti and Werner (BLW) have recently criticized the operator approach to the description of quantum errors and disturbances. Their criticisms are justified to the extent that the physical meaning of the operator definitions has not hitherto been adequately explained. We rectify that omission. We then examine BLW's criticisms in the light of our analysis. We argue that, although the approach BLW favour (based on the Wasserstein 2-deviation) has its uses, there are important physical situations where an operator approach is preferable. We also discuss the reason why the error-disturbance relation is still giving rise to controversies almost a century after Heisenberg first stated his microscope argument. We argue that the source of the difficulties is the problem of interpretation, which is not so wholly disconnected from experimental practicalities as is sometimes supposed.

arXiv commentAMS latex, 29 pages

References in corpus (29)

• Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle
• Universally valid reformulation of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle on noise and disturbance in measurement
• Quantum-Bayesian Coherence: The No-Nonsense Version
• Uncertainty Relations for Noise and Disturbance in Generalized Quantum Measurements
• Proof of Heisenberg's error-disturbance relation
• Quantum root-mean-square error and measurement uncertainty relations
• Prior information: how to circumvent the standard joint-measurement uncertainty relation
• Experimental Test of Error-Disturbance Uncertainty Relations by Weak Measurement
• Uncertainty Relations for Joint Measurements of Noncommuting Observables
• Simulating Quantum Mechanics by Non-Contextual Hidden Variables
• Experimental test of universal complementarity relations
• Physical content of Heisenberg's uncertainty relation: Limitation and reformulation
• Measurement uncertainty relations
• Noise and disturbance in quantum mechanics
• Operational constraints on state-dependent formulations of quantum error-disturbance trade-off relations
• Position measuring interactions and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle
• Deriving tight error-trade-off relations for approximate joint measurements of incompatible quantum observables
• Maximal Accuracy and Minimal Disturbance in the Arthurs-Kelly Simultaneous Measurement Process
• Disproving Heisenberg's error-disturbance relation
• Generic Bohmian Trajectories of an Isolated Particle
• Heisenberg's uncertainty relation: Violation and reformulation
• Error-disturbance relations in mixed states
• The Concept of Experimental Accuracy and Simultaneous Measurements of Position and Momentum
• Measurement Uncertainty: Reply to Critics
• Bohmian Trajectories Post-Decoherence
• Optimal Joint Measurements of Position and Momentum
• Optimal Measurements of Spin Direction
• Comment on "Noise and Disturbance in Quantum Measurements: An Information-Theoretic Approach"
• Comment on "Experimental Test of Error-Disturbance Uncertainty Relations by Weak Measurement"

Cited by in corpus (8)

• Incorporating Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle into Quantum Multiparameter Estimation
• Uncertainty from Heisenberg to Today
• Measurement uncertainty relations for discrete observables: Relative entropy formulation
• Uncertainty and Trade-offs in Quantum Multiparameter Estimation
• Understanding quantum mechanics: a review and synthesis in precise language
• Measurement Uncertainty for Finite Quantum Observables
• Uncertainty relations: An operational approach to the error-disturbance tradeoff
• Born's rule and measurement