Shelah's eventual categoricity conjecture in universal classes. Part II
arXiv:1602.02633 · doi:10.1007/s00029-016-0296-0
Abstract
We prove that a universal class categorical in a high-enough cardinal is categorical on a tail of cardinals. As opposed to other results in the literature, we work in ZFC, do not require the categoricity cardinal to be a successor, do not assume amalgamation, and do not use large cardinals. Moreover we give an explicit bound on the "high-enough" threshold: Let be a universal sentence. If is categorical in some , then is categorical in all . As a byproduct of the proof, we show that a conjecture of Grossberg holds in universal classes: Let be a universal sentence that is categorical in some , then the class of models of has the amalgamation property for models of size at least . We also establish generalizations of these two results to uncountable languages. As part of the argument, we develop machinery to transfer model-theoretic properties between two different classes satisfying a compatibility condition. This is used as a bridge between Shelah's milestone study of universal classes (which we use extensively) and a categoricity transfer theorem of the author for abstract elementary classes that have amalgamation, are tame, and have primes over sets of the form .
49 pages
References in corpus (2)
Cited by in corpus (10)
- Shelah's eventual categoricity conjecture in universal classes: part I
- Forking independence from the categorical point of view
- Superstability from categoricity in abstract elementary classes
- Saturation and solvability in abstract elementary classes with amalgamation
- Toward a stability theory of tame abstract elementary classes
- Universal classes near
- Shelah's eventual categoricity conjecture in tame AECs with primes
- Structural Logic and Abstract Elementary Classes with Intersection
- On categoricity in successive cardinals
- Tameness from two successive good frames