Diagnostics and future evolution analysis of the two parametric models

Abstract

In this paper, we apply three diagnostics including $Om$, Statefinder hierarchy and the growth rate of perturbations into discriminating the two parametric models for the effective pressure with the $\Lambda$CDM model. By using the $Om$ diagnostic, we find that both the model 1 and the model 2 can be hardly distinguished from each other as well as the $\Lambda$CDM model in terms of 68\% confidence level. As a supplement, by using the Statefinder hierarchy diagnostics and the growth rate of perturbations, we discover that not only can our two parametric models be well distinguished from $\Lambda$CDM model, but also, by comparing with $Om$ diagnostic, the model 1 and the model 2 can be distinguished better from each other. In addition, we also explore the fate of universe evolution of our two models by means of the rip analysis.

References in corpus (11)

• Two new diagnostics of dark energy
• Statefinder Diagnosis for Ricci Dark Energy
• Statefinder diagnosis for the interacting model of holographic dark energy
• Next Generation Redshift Surveys and the Origin of Cosmic Acceleration
• The Statefinder hierarchy: An extended null diagnostic for concordance cosmology
• Statefinder hierarchy of bimetric and galileon models for concordance cosmology
• How to Falsify the GR+LambdaCDM Model with Galaxy Redshift Surveys
• Statefinder parameters in two dark energy models
• Can we ever distinguish between quintessence and a cosmological constant?
• Geometrical diagnostic for purely kinetic k-essence dark energy
• Generalized Cosmic Chaplygin Gas Model with or without Interaction