Constraining Multiplicative Bias in CFHTLenS Weak Lensing Shear Data

Abstract

Several recent cosmological analyses have found tension between constraints derived from the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Lensing Survey (CFHTLenS) data and those derived from other data sets, such as the Planck cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature anisotropies. Similarly, a direct cross-correlation of the CFHTLenS data with Planck CMB lensing data yielded an anomalously low amplitude compared to expectations based on Planck or WMAP-derived cosmological parameters (Liu & Hill 2015). One potential explanation for these results is a multiplicative bias afflicting the CFHTLenS galaxy shape measurements, from which shears are inferred. Simulations are used in the CFHTLenS pipeline to calibrate such biases, but no data-driven constraints have been presented to date. In this paper, we cross-correlate CFHTLenS galaxy density maps with CFHTLenS shear maps and Planck CMB lensing maps to calibrate an additional multiplicative shear bias (m) in CFHTLenS (beyond the multiplicative correction that has already been applied to the CFHTLenS galaxy shears), following methods suggested by Vallinotto (2012) and Das et al. (2013). We analyze three magnitude-limited galaxy samples, finding 2-4sigma evidence for m<1 using the deepest sample (i<24), while the others are consistent with m=1 (no bias). This matches the expectation that the shapes of faint galaxies are the most prone to measurement biases. Our results for m are essentially independent of the assumed cosmology, and only weakly sensitive to assumptions about the galaxy bias. We consider three galaxy bias models, finding in all cases that the best-fit multiplicative shear bias is less than unity. A value of m~0.9 would suffice to reconcile the amplitude of density fluctuations inferred from the CFHTLenS shear two-point statistics with that inferred from Planck CMB temperature data. This scenario is consistent with our results.

7 pages, 5 figures; v3: matches PRD accepted version

References in corpus (4)

• Why your model parameter confidences might be too optimistic -- unbiased estimation of the inverse covariance matrix
• The Intrinsic Alignment of Galaxies and its Impact on Weak Gravitational Lensing in an Era of Precision Cosmology
• Is there concordance within the concordance $\Lambda$CDM model?
• Discrepancies between CFHTLenS cosmic shear & Planck: new physics or systematic effects?

Cited by in corpus (30)

• The Simons Observatory: Science goals and forecasts
• KiDS-450: Testing extensions to the standard cosmological model
• Parameter constraints from cross-correlation of CMB lensing with galaxy clustering
• The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: A CMB lensing mass map over 2100 square degrees of sky and its cross-correlation with BOSS-CMASS galaxies
• Mitigating Foreground Biases in CMB Lensing Reconstruction Using Cleaned Gradients
• PSZ2LenS. Weak lensing analysis of the Planck clusters in the CFHTLenS and in the RCSLenS
• Looking through the same lens: shear calibration for LSST, Euclid & WFIRST with stage 4 CMB lensing
• A study of the sensitivity of shape measurements to the input parameters of weak lensing image simulations
• Cross-correlating Planck CMB lensing with SDSS: Lensing-lensing and galaxy-lensing cross-correlations
• Joint Measurement of Lensing-Galaxy Correlations Using SPT and DES SV Data
• CMB lensing reconstruction biases in cross-correlation with large-scale structure probes
• Partially Acoustic Dark Matter Cosmology and Cosmological Constraints
• Bias to CMB Lensing Reconstruction from Temperature Anisotropies due to Large-Scale Galaxy Motions
• Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Methodology and Projections for Joint Analysis of Galaxy Clustering, Galaxy Lensing, and CMB Lensing Two-point Functions
• CMB-lensing beyond the Born approximation
• CMB Lensing Beyond the Power Spectrum: Cosmological Constraints from the One-Point PDF and Peak Counts
• Testing gravity on large scales by combining weak lensing with galaxy clustering using CFHTLenS and BOSS CMASS
• Modeling CMB Lensing Cross Correlations with {\sc CLEFT}
• Discrepancies between CFHTLenS cosmic shear & Planck: new physics or systematic effects?
• Cosmological constraints from a joint analysis of cosmic microwave background and spectroscopic tracers of the large-scale structure
• New perspectives on the BOSS small-scale lensing discrepancy for the Planck $\Lambda$CDM Cosmology
• KiDS-450: Tomographic Cross-Correlation of Galaxy Shear with {\it Planck} Lensing
• Integrated approach to cosmology: Combining CMB, large-scale structure and weak lensing
• Measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization Lensing Power Spectrum from Two Years of POLARBEAR Data
• Cross-correlation between Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam Galaxy Weak Lensing and Planck Cosmic Microwave Background Lensing
• Developing a unified pipeline for large-scale structure data analysis with angular power spectra -- I. The importance of redshift-space distortions for galaxy number counts
• Evidence for the Cross-correlation between Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization Lensing from POLARBEAR and Cosmic Shear from Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam
• Measurement of a Cosmographic Distance Ratio with Galaxy and CMB Lensing
• Systematic tests for position-dependent additive shear bias
• A halo model of extragalactic contamination to CMB lensing, delensing, and cross-correlations