Fighting Uncertainty with Uncertainty: A Baby Step
arXiv:1601.04043 · doi:10.4236/tel.2017.75097
Abstract
We can overcome uncertainty with uncertainty. Using randomness in our choices and in what we control, and hence in the decision making process, could potentially offset the uncertainty inherent in the environment and yield better outcomes. The example we develop in greater detail is the news-vendor inventory management problem with demand uncertainty. We briefly discuss areas, where such an approach might be helpful, with the common prescription, "Don't Simply Optimize, Also Randomize; perhaps best described by the term - Randoptimization". 1. News-vendor Inventory Management 2. School Admissions 3. Journal Submissions 4. Job Candidate Selection 5. Stock Picking 6. Monetary Policy This methodology is suitable for the social sciences since the primary source of uncertainty are the members of the system themselves and presently, no methods are known to fully determine the outcomes in such an environment, which perhaps would require being able to read the minds of everyone involved and to anticipate their actions continuously. Admittedly, we are not qualified to recommend whether such an approach is conducive for the natural sciences, unless perhaps, bounds can be established on the levels of uncertainty in a system and it is shown conclusively that a better understanding of the system and hence improved decision making will not alter the outcomes.
References in corpus (5)
- A Tale of Two Consequences: Intended and Unintended Outcomes of the Japan TOPIX Tick Size Changes
- Hong Kong -- Shanghai Connect / Hong Kong -- Beijing Disconnect (?): Scaling the Great Wall of Chinese Securities Trading Costs
- Microstructure under the Microscope: Tools to Survive and Thrive in The Age of (Too Much) Information
- Dynamic Multi-Factor Bid-Offer Adjustment Model: A Feedback Mechanism for Dealers (Market Makers) to Deal (Grapple) with the Uncertainty Principle of the Social Sciences
- Solving Society's Big Ills, A Small Step