Validity of time reversal for testing Granger causality

Abstract

Inferring causal interactions from observed data is a challenging problem, especially in the presence of measurement noise. To alleviate the problem of spurious causality, Haufe et al. (2013) proposed to contrast measures of information flow obtained on the original data against the same measures obtained on time-reversed data. They show that this procedure, time-reversed Granger causality (TRGC), robustly rejects causal interpretations on mixtures of independent signals. While promising results have been achieved in simulations, it was so far unknown whether time reversal leads to valid measures of information flow in the presence of true interaction. Here we prove that, for linear finite-order autoregressive processes with unidirectional information flow, the application of time reversal for testing Granger causality indeed leads to correct estimates of information flow and its directionality. Using simulations, we further show that TRGC is able to infer correct directionality with similar statistical power as the net Granger causality between two variables, while being much more robust to the presence of measurement noise.

References in corpus (3)

• Robustly estimating the flow direction of information in complex physical systems
• Kernel method for nonlinear Granger causality
• Mitigating the effects of measurement noise on Granger causality

Cited by in corpus (5)

• Inference in non-equilibrium systems from incomplete information: the case of linear systems and its pitfalls
• Interpretable Models for Granger Causality Using Self-explaining Neural Networks
• Information thermodynamics for interacting stochastic systems without bipartite structure
• Statistical Perspective on Functional and Causal Neural Connectomics: A Comparative Study
• Learning interaction rules from multi-animal trajectories via augmented behavioral models