Collective dynamics of belief evolution under cognitive coherence and social conformity

Abstract

Human history has been marked by social instability and conflict, often driven by the irreconcilability of opposing sets of beliefs, ideologies, and religious dogmas. The dynamics of belief systems has been studied mainly from two distinct perspectives, namely how cognitive biases lead to individual belief rigidity and how social influence leads to social conformity. Here we propose a unifying framework that connects cognitive and social forces together in order to study the dynamics of societal belief evolution. Each individual is endowed with a network of interacting beliefs that evolves through interaction with other individuals in a social network. The adoption of beliefs is affected by both internal coherence and social conformity. Our framework explains how social instabilities can arise in otherwise homogeneous populations, how small numbers of zealots with highly coherent beliefs can overturn societal consensus, and how belief rigidity protects fringe groups and cults against invasion from mainstream beliefs, allowing them to persist and even thrive in larger societies. Our results suggest that strong consensus may be insufficient to guarantee social stability, that the cognitive coherence of belief-systems is vital in determining their ability to spread, and that coherent belief-systems may pose a serious problem for resolving social polarization, due to their ability to prevent consensus even under high levels of social exposure. We therefore argue that the inclusion of cognitive factors into a social model is crucial in providing a more complete picture of collective human dynamics.

References in corpus (14)

• Statistical physics of social dynamics
• Benchmarks for testing community detection algorithms on directed and weighted graphs with overlapping communities
• Sociophysics: A review of Galam models
• Voter Models on Heterogeneous Networks
• Does a Single Zealot Affect an Infinite Group of Voters ?
• Fundamental structures of dynamic social networks
• On the Role of Zealotry in the Voter Model
• Social Balance on Networks: The Dynamics of Friendship and Enmity
• Heterogeneous Voter Models
• Opinion Dynamics with Confirmation Bias
• Nonlinear $q$-voter model with inflexible zealots
• Voting and Catalytic Processes with Inhomogeneities
• Committed activists and the reshaping of status-quo social consensus
• Can Partisan Voting Lead to Truth?

Cited by in corpus (14)

• Emergence of metapopulations and echo chambers in mobile agents
• Dynamics of organizational culture: Individual beliefs vs. social conformity
• Tipping points in opinion dynamics: a universal formula in five dimensions
• Critical mass effect in evolutionary games triggered by zealots
• Homophily-based social group formation in a spin-glass self-assembly framework
• Dynamical Galam model
• Emergence of simple and complex contagion dynamics from weighted belief networks
• Opinion polarization in human communities can emerge as a natural consequence of beliefs being interrelated
• A semantic embedding space based on large language models for modelling human beliefs
• Opinion Dynamics with Continuous Age Structure
• One pathogen does not an epidemic make: A review of interacting contagions, diseases, beliefs, and stories
• Nucleation transitions in polycontextural networks toward consensus
• Your most telling friends: Propagating latent ideological features on Twitter using neighborhood coherence
• Sherlock Holmes Doesn't Play Dice: The mathematics of uncertain reasoning when something may happen, that one is not even able to figure out