Randomization beats Second Price as a Prior-Independent Auction
arXiv:1507.08042
Abstract
Designing revenue optimal auctions for selling an item to symmetric bidders is a fundamental problem in mechanism design. Myerson (1981) shows that the second price auction with an appropriate reserve price is optimal when bidders' values are drawn i.i.d. from a known regular distribution. A cornerstone in the prior-independent revenue maximization literature is a result by Bulow and Klemperer (1996) showing that the second price auction without a reserve achieves of the optimal revenue in the worst case. We construct a randomized mechanism that strictly outperforms the second price auction in this setting. Our mechanism inflates the second highest bid with a probability that varies with . For two bidders we improve the performance guarantee from to of the optimal revenue. We also resolve a question in the design of revenue optimal mechanisms that have access to a single sample from an unknown distribution. We show that a randomized mechanism strictly outperforms all deterministic mechanisms in terms of worst case guarantee.
References in corpus (2)
Cited by in corpus (7)
- How to manipulate truthful prior-dependent mechanisms?
- Thresholding at the monopoly price: an agnostic way to improve bidding strategies in revenue-maximizing auctions
- The Vickrey Auction with a Single Duplicate Bidder Approximates the Optimal Revenue
- An End-to-end Argument in Mechanism Design (Prior-independent Auctions for Budgeted Agents)
- Benchmark Design and Prior-independent Optimization
- Revelation Gap for Pricing from Samples
- Are Two (Samples) Really Better Than One? On the Non-Asymptotic Performance of Empirical Revenue Maximization