Water: one molecule, two surfaces, one mistake
arXiv:1505.08021 · doi:10.1080/00268976.2015.1005191
Abstract
In order to rigorously evaluate the energy and dipole moment of a certain configuration of molecules one needs to solve the Schrödinger equation. Repeating this for many different configurations allows one to determine the potential energy surface (PES) and the dipole moment surface (DMS). Since the early days of computer simulation it has been implicitly accepted that for empirical potentials the charges used to fit the PES should also be used to describe the DMS. This is a mistake. Partial charges are not observable magnitudes. They should be regarded as adjustable fitting parameters. Optimal values used to describe the PES are not necessarily the best to describe the DMS. One could use two fits: one for the PES, and another for the DMS. This is a common practice in the quantum chemistry community, but not used so often by the community performing computer simulations. This idea affects all types of modelling of water (with the exception of ab-initio calculations) from coarse grained to non-polarizable and polarizable models. We anticipate that an area that will benefit dramatically from having both, a good PES and a good DMS, is the modelling of water in the presence of electric fields.
2 figures
References in corpus (13)
- Perspective on density functional theory
- Competing quantum effects in the dynamics of a flexible water model
- Nuclear quantum effects in water
- What ice can teach us about water interactions: a critical comparison of the performance of different water models
- Homogeneous ice nucleation at moderate supercooling from molecular simulation
- Density, structure and dynamics of water: the effect of Van der Waals interactions
- The thickness of a liquid layer on the free surface of ice as obtained from computer simulation
- The electronic structure of liquid water within density functional theory
- Polarizable molecular interactions in condensed phase and their equivalent nonpolarizable models
- Quantum contributions in the ice phases: the path to a new empirical model for water -- TIP4PQ/2005
- Three-dimensional "Mercedes-Benz" model for water
- Polar nanoregions in water - a study of the dielectric properties of TIP4P/2005, TIP4P/2005f and TTM3F
- Minimum in the thermal conductivity of supercooled water: a computer simulation study
Cited by in corpus (12)
- A force field of Li , Na , K, Mg, Ca, Cl, and SO in aqueous solution based on the TIP4P/2005 water model and scaled charges for the ions
- Raman Spectrum and Polarizability of Liquid Water from Deep Neural Networks
- The Madrid-2019 force field for electrolytes in water using TIP4P/2005 and scaled charges: extension to the ions F, Br, I, Rb, Cs
- Scaled charges for ions: an improvement but not the final word for modeling electrolytes in water
- Computation of Electrical Conductivities of Aqueous Electrolyte Solutions: Two Surfaces , One Property
- Melting points of water models: Current situation
- Molecular modeling of aqueous electrolytes at interfaces: effects of long-range dispersion forces and of ionic charge rescaling
- Critical role of quantum dynamical effects in the Raman spectroscopy of liquid water
- How important is the dielectric constant in water modeling? Evaluation of the performance of the TIP4P/ force field and its compatibility with the Joung-Cheatham NaCl model
- Atomistic Simulation Framework for Molten Salt Vapor-Liquid Equilibrium Prediction and its Application to NaCl
- Using a monomer potential energy surface to perform approximate path integral molecular dynamics simulation of ab-initio water with near-zero added cost
- Molecular dynamics study of perchloric acid using the extended Madrid-2019 force field